[RussMcB]

is it just my eyes or what ?
But i find the video not really clear as much as the others i have seen.

If you are commenting on the YouTube videos, it's probably due to the degradation from posting to that web site. I've heard there are better video hosting web sites in terms of quality (Vimeo?). Take a look at the videos on GoPro's web site. The quality looks pretty good there, especially considering the cost of these cameras. I'm not sure what the next cost step up is, but it's probably a pretty big jump.

 

[RussMcB]

The bottom of the box says use lithium batteries in cold weather, NiMH in normal temps. Anything else may have disappointing results. Maybe their web site has info about how long a battery should last.

The web site has videos:

http://goprocamera.com/

 

[RussMcB]

PMs replied

This was brought up but there is another earlier version of this camera that was out. It was 54 degree camera that had a MRSP for $179.99. This one is similar but different with better video angles and clarity.

I bought one recently (sorry, not from you .

The GoPro folks were pretty convincing when they said this new Wide version is much better than the earlier version. The earlier version was a good deal, but some people had problems with cameras turning off due to vibration, short battery life, wavy video or audio, etc. A lot of people had no problems at all, but I did on my race car. I'm looking forward to trying this new one out. AFAIK, it is the cheapest in-car (on-bike) video option.

The Motorsports version comes with a good assortment of mounting thingies, too.