Kawasaki ZX-10R Forum banner

1 - 20 of 26 Posts

·
Shorty's Performance
Joined
·
8,860 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)
i dont believe most of this so call shootout!!!
whats up with the torque numbers? am i missing something?

Max HorsePower
GSX-R1000K7 - 164,2hp @ 11750 rpm
'07 YZF-R1 - 161,9hp @ 12310 rpm
ZX10R - 158hp @ 12080 rpm
MVF41000R - 157.1hp @ 11730 rpm
CBR1000RR 148,9hp @ 10930 rpm
1098S - 145,9hp @ 9750 rpm

Max Torque
1098s 111,38 @ 7780 rpm
GSX-R1000K7 - 109,46 @ 8950 rpm
ZX10R - 105,34 @ 8630 rpm
'07 YZF-R1 - 105,08 @ 9650 rpm
MVF41000R - 103,73 @ 9910 rpm
CBR1000RR 102,79 @ 8590 rpm

Top Speed KM/H
GSX-R1000K7 - 290,6
MVF41000R - 289,9
'07 YZF-R1 - 289,1
ZX10R - 282,1
CBR1000RR - 276,1
1098s - 275,1

Weight with 5 liters of fuel
1098S - 189,2
YZF -R1 192,9
ZX10R - 196,7
CBR1000RR - 198,7
GSX-R1000K7 - 203,5
MVF41000R 207,5

Best Lap Time and average of 6 best lap time on Siracusa
MVF41000R: 1'46''2 - 1'46''9
GSX-R1000K7: 1'46''4 - 1'46''8
YZF-R1: 1'46''9 - 1'47''5
1098S: 1'47''1 - 1'47''4
ZX10R: 1'47''4 - 1'47''9
CBR1000RR: 1'47''5 - 1'47''8
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
168 Posts
As I hope we all know, number variey by Dyno.... if they were all Dyno'ed on the same machine, then the numbers are very relevant. I know they also use a different measure for Torque and Hp, which are close but do differ than what we use here in the states(metric there). As for the HP numbers, people need to get off it and realize, they are only relative to your skill level. If you notice the times posted on the track, look how close they are. That number has less to do with Hp than any of the other figure's posted up there. So the ten didn't make it to the top of the list, does it really matter? Shall we all wip em out and start measuring... come on people :headshake
 

·
Supercharged Mod
Joined
·
4,392 Posts
The units for torque in that test are (European-standard) N.m, not the usual (for North America) lb.ft ...

Divide by 1.35 to get the lb.ft numbers, all you 'murricans!

I'm somewhat surprised that the power output wasn't in kW.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
707 Posts
I have done 288 GPS and it still had some to go, so the TOP speed info does not make sense and I suspect the other numbers are prolly the same.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,577 Posts
GoFaster said:
The units for torque in that test are (European-standard) N.m, not the usual (for North America) lb.ft ...

Divide by 1.35 to get the lb.ft numbers, all you 'murricans!

I'm somewhat surprised that the power output wasn't in kW.
:+1: N.m. = Newton meters.....metric measure of torque
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,442 Posts
You left out the times on the other tracks....

lap time at Vallelunga track:

mv 1'46,2
k7 1'46,4
r1 1'46,9
1098s 1'47,1
zx 1'47,4
cbr 1'47,5

Lap time at siracusa track

mv 1'49,1
zx 1'49,7
1098s 1'49,7
r1 1'49,8
cbr 1'52,0
rsv 1'52,2


MCN track test at guadix circuit
5th Ducati 1098 fastest lap 1:28.69

4th Honda CBR1000RR 127.62

3th Suzuki GSX-R1000K7 1:27.47

2th Kawasaki ZX10R 1:27.38

1th Yamaha R1 1000 1:26.54

All the bikes were on pirelli diablo corsa tyres.
 

·
Bloo Moderator
Joined
·
23,742 Posts
Bad MO4 said:
Too bad they don't offer the Gixxer here in all black. The Gixxer is going to be the shit in this new round of bikes.
In what way? If you really believe that you might want to change your profile that says :passing you in the corner, SoCal & LoCal
Bike: Rough around the edges 1st Gen.: to I'm going to get my arse handed to me by the New Gixxer :wink:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
67 Posts
The cbr was only a couple under the 10 last year. I dont know how it could lose 10hp. BS numbers
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,028 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,346 Posts
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
Top