Even More Layoff's - Kawasaki ZX-10R.net
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 12 Old 05-05-2012, 08:47 AM Thread Starter
Servo's Eliminatus ;)
 
hellsrazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gulf Coast of Mississippi
Posts: 6,813
Posting Frequency
Images: 23
           
Even More Layoff's

The major shipyard that I got laid off from just announced even more layoffs.
Things are not looking good economically for this area.
They are down to 2 ships in the yard which normally has about 6 in the water
and 5 or 6 on land being assembled.
Right now there's 1 in the water close to being done and 1 on land that will be
going in the water soon.
No new hulls being laid, no new steel hitting the yard, nothing.

They are down to probably 4 or 5 thousand employees when they normally
have 9 to 12 thousand.
And now their cutting even more.

75% of the 18,000 people that live here, work there. For now that is.
This town is on its way to withering and dying.

Property value is going to bottom out and your not going to the able to sell houses.

If your hair is short and nappy...
Afrosheen will make you happy.
Anyone remember that one from the 1970's ?

Last edited by hellsrazor; 05-05-2012 at 09:25 AM.
hellsrazor is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 12 Old 05-05-2012, 09:22 AM
WSB Rider
 
soida's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 654
Posting Frequency
   
Bummer!!
Is there any hope for callbacks if things pick back up,,or are the jobs gone for good?

قودبيي فتهر
soida is offline  
post #3 of 12 Old 05-05-2012, 09:29 AM Thread Starter
Servo's Eliminatus ;)
 
hellsrazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gulf Coast of Mississippi
Posts: 6,813
Posting Frequency
Images: 23
           
Quote:
Originally Posted by soida View Post
Bummer!!
Is there any hope for callbacks if things pick back up,,or are the jobs gone for good?
Oh yeah, this is a Union job.
And they will have to recall laid off employees first before hiring outsiders.
But, that's if they get more work.
With the gub ment cutting military spending,
They aren't ordering many ships for the Navy and Coast Guard.

If your hair is short and nappy...
Afrosheen will make you happy.
Anyone remember that one from the 1970's ?
hellsrazor is offline  
post #4 of 12 Old 05-05-2012, 10:11 AM
Champion Rider
 
aszrael1266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: bay area california
Posts: 314
Posting Frequency
   
but the corps and 1% are making record profits, the trickle down effect will kick in just you wait.


On a serious note that really does suck. When the whole melt down started I was working in banking. In a 5 year time frame I went through 6 jobs. I was laid off from each one due to down sizing or the bank being taken over by another bank. I had to get out and luckily enough was able to get into a different market. I don't make half as much as I did before but I've been at the same job just over a year now so at least that is something. I know a good amount of people that left CA to try and find greener pastures. I hope things work out where you at.
aszrael1266 is offline  
post #5 of 12 Old 05-05-2012, 10:43 AM
WSB Rider
 
logmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montana
Posts: 667
Posting Frequency
Images: 2
   
its bad all over.

going to get worse.

hellsrazor: do you know anything about the laws affecting the transport of domestic oil from US port to US port ?

I read that there was a law enacted that a special type of ship is now required to do that and the US has very few of them. So we , US, need to rely on foreign ships to do the transfer ( it would be to move crude from one area of the country to another where there are refineries) and that there are so few available that the most cost-effective thing to do is just export/sell the crude to another country.

I dont understand why we (US) cant just build the ships necessary to do this? maybe with the anti-oil administration the ship building companies dont think sinking the money into shipbuilding-speculation worth taking?

any thoughts?
logmaster is offline  
post #6 of 12 Old 05-05-2012, 11:06 AM
Does not drive into smoke
 
El Zilcho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,156
Posting Frequency
       
Quote:
Originally Posted by logmaster View Post
I read that there was a law enacted that a special type of ship is now required to do that and the US has very few of them.
There is a law that only allows US-based ships to transport oil between US ports. There have been waivers granted in the past to allow foreign tankers to do that, and if I understand this correctly, Obama has also issued such a waiver.
I believe they are temporary and are issued to meet the current demand (i.e. short term, with no time to wait for more ships being built), but I don't know any details.
El Zilcho is offline  
post #7 of 12 Old 05-05-2012, 11:07 AM
Champion Rider
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 372
Posting Frequency
  
Quote:
Originally Posted by logmaster View Post
its bad all over.


I dont understand why we (US) cant just build the ships necessary to do this? maybe with the anti-oil administration the ship building companies dont think sinking the money into shipbuilding-speculation worth taking?

any thoughts?
Maybe this does, maybe this doesn't have to do with answering your question. I was flipping through the stations and there was this show called shark tank. People come in with their ideas and these rich guys either invest or not.

There was a guy that manufactured a portable work rack for pickups. He wanted to manufacture it in his town so the neighbors that lost their jobs can have a job in this new idea. One of the rich guys insisted to outsource the manufacturing off shore so there can be a higher profit margin. The small town guy refused, he'd rather have the jobs for his town.

He left with no one investing in his idea.

enrico vespa is offline  
post #8 of 12 Old 05-05-2012, 11:10 AM Thread Starter
Servo's Eliminatus ;)
 
hellsrazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gulf Coast of Mississippi
Posts: 6,813
Posting Frequency
Images: 23
           
Quote:
Originally Posted by logmaster View Post
its bad all over.

going to get worse.

hellsrazor: do you know anything about the laws affecting the transport of domestic oil from US port to US port ?

I read that there was a law enacted that a special type of ship is now required to do that and the US has very few of them. So we , US, need to rely on foreign ships to do the transfer ( it would be to move crude from one area of the country to another where there are refineries) and that there are so few available that the most cost-effective thing to do is just export/sell the crude to another country.

I dont understand why we (US) cant just build the ships necessary to do this? maybe with the anti-oil administration the ship building companies dont think sinking the money into shipbuilding-speculation worth taking?

any thoughts?
Not gonna perpetrate bro, I don't know squat about that.
I've been working on Destroyers (DDG's), Cruisers (CG's), LHD's,
LHA's & LPD's and Coast Guard's Deep water Program,
Pretty much since 1990 till my layoff.

I also have worked on the Navy's Experimental Catamaran and DDX.
Worked mainly (CIC) Combat Information Center, and Sonar.

So in hind sight, I've kinda screwed myself by specializing in Navy ships
and not the oil industry's and Maritime ships.
Because Navy ships electronics and electrical are completely different than Maritime ships.

Now I'm an older fuggar and people don't want to give me the chance to
work and learn the Maritime side of it.

I'm trying to find a way to get into Flux Core training,
Because the Department of Labor and Workers Compensation is willing to pay for my schooling from being a Veteran and being hurt on the job requiring surgery on both knee's that now sport a 10 percent (PPD)
Permanent Partial Disability.

If your hair is short and nappy...
Afrosheen will make you happy.
Anyone remember that one from the 1970's ?
hellsrazor is offline  
post #9 of 12 Old 05-05-2012, 11:23 AM
Does not drive into smoke
 
El Zilcho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,156
Posting Frequency
       
El Zilcho is offline  
post #10 of 12 Old 05-05-2012, 11:39 AM
WSB Rider
 
soida's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 654
Posting Frequency
   
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Zilcho View Post

Interesting article. It was from March 2012, did Obama sign off on the waivers? It sounds like he might not have seeing that Trey's work is drying up...

Anybody got any info???

Anyway,,I hope Trey can get the training he needs so he can keep riding!!!!

قودبيي فتهر
soida is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Kawasaki ZX-10R.net forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome