Gen 5: 2016 -> Sprocket change or OEM? - Page 2 - Kawasaki ZX-10R.net
 8Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 45 Old 01-03-2017, 12:19 PM
WSB Rider
 
Duhastme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Fort Myers
Posts: 568
Posting Frequency
    
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShawnG View Post
-1 +2 still indicated 186mph on my bike and gets there in no time.. when i had -1f it would still max out the cluster with most of 6th gear to go if i remember correctly.
Sorry to go off topic OP

So I just ran into this the other day. So if the ECU is flashed and the top speed limiter is disabled, gearingcommander.com says 6th gear at 13k rpm you will be doing 187 which is what my speedo read. Although if you look at there gearing top speed table with 49 different combinations it states a top speed of 168 mph. I believe I must be missing or not understanding the graph correctly. If anyone can chime in I would appreciate it.
Duhastme is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 45 Old 01-03-2017, 12:35 PM
REPOST Enforcement Mod
 
SkyDork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL (The Dub-C)
Posts: 13,219
Posting Frequency
           
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duhastme View Post
Sorry to go off topic OP

So I just ran into this the other day. So if the ECU is flashed and the top speed limiter is disabled, gearingcommander.com says 6th gear at 13k rpm you will be doing 187 which is what my speedo read. Although if you look at there gearing top speed table with 49 different combinations it states a top speed of 168 mph. I believe I must be missing or not understanding the graph correctly. If anyone can chime in I would appreciate it.
The RPM shown on gearingcommander uses the peak torque value of 13,000RPM. If you can actually get it to the redline (which is a higher probability than stock), the speed will increase above what's shown. It's much easier to get the motor to redline in 6th gear on a bike geared down versus stock. So at 14,000rpm with -1F/+2R the top speed is 175mph. Given that the tires will grow slightly and change the gearing at that speed and the error in the speedometer, it's very likely the indicated speed would be higher than that although the bike isn't actually going that fast.

FYI- stock gearing at 14,000rpm is 195mph unrestricted.

I may not be perfect, but at least I don't ride a Suzuki.

Ridding the Internet of bad grammar, 1 post at a time.
#WordCrimes




SkyDork is offline  
post #13 of 45 Old 01-03-2017, 12:59 PM
WSB Rider
 
Duhastme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Fort Myers
Posts: 568
Posting Frequency
    
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyDork View Post
The RPM shown on gearingcommander uses the peak torque value of 13,000RPM. If you can actually get it to the redline (which is a higher probability than stock), the speed will increase above what's shown. It's much easier to get the motor to redline in 6th gear on a bike geared down versus stock. So at 14,000rpm with -1F/+2R the top speed is 175mph. Given that the tires will grow slightly and change the gearing at that speed and the error in the speedometer, it's very likely the indicated speed would be higher than that although the bike isn't actually going that fast.

FYI- stock gearing at 14,000rpm is 195mph unrestricted.
Sorry forget to mention that I am -1 +2 same as the gentleman that I quoted which you seem to have understood. So basically (gotta keep it simple for me ) that the difference in tire change and error in the speedo, that my mph readout is correct? Just seemed like it gets up there so quickly that it could not be right.

Now when i go to the website and increase the stock rpm from 13k to 14k it shows me that the top speed is 202. What am I missing?
Duhastme is offline  
 
post #14 of 45 Old 01-03-2017, 01:06 PM
REPOST Enforcement Mod
 
SkyDork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL (The Dub-C)
Posts: 13,219
Posting Frequency
           
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duhastme View Post
Sorry forget to mention that I am -1 +2 same as the gentleman that I quoted which you seem to have understood. So basically (gotta keep it simple for me ) that the difference in tire change and error in the speedo, that my mph readout is correct? Just seemed like it gets up there so quickly that it could not be right.

Now when i go to the website and increase the stock rpm from 13k to 14k it shows me that the top speed is 202. What am I missing?
No, I think your speedo is reading high. Same as the other guy. Given that the speedo is optimistic is part of the reason you're seeing such a high reading. But both of you are saying that the speedo is reading 187ish and the website is showing 181mph for that combo. So you're right in the same ballpark. The speedo error and some tire differences/changes are accounting for the other differences.

Edit: It would help if I used Gen 4 values in there and not my Gen 5.

I may not be perfect, but at least I don't ride a Suzuki.

Ridding the Internet of bad grammar, 1 post at a time.
#WordCrimes





Last edited by SkyDork; 01-03-2017 at 01:12 PM. Reason: Wrong values
SkyDork is offline  
post #15 of 45 Old 01-03-2017, 01:27 PM
WSB Rider
 
Duhastme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Fort Myers
Posts: 568
Posting Frequency
    
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyDork View Post
No, I think your speedo is reading high. Same as the other guy. Given that the speedo is optimistic is part of the reason you're seeing such a high reading. But both of you are saying that the speedo is reading 187ish and the website is showing 181mph for that combo. So you're right in the same ballpark. The speedo error and some tire differences/changes are accounting for the other differences.

Edit: It would help if I used Gen 4 values in there and not my Gen 5.
I see now says the blind man! thanks for the info, knowledge is power they say
Duhastme is offline  
post #16 of 45 Old 01-03-2017, 11:47 PM
Squid
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 17
Posting Frequency
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by vroomshankar View Post
Was picking up a set of chain and sprockets for my Gen 5. Had a few queries on them so looking for some help:

1. Should I go for -1/+2 or -1/+1 or keep the sprocketing stock? I do find the bike takes its own sweet time to rev up till the powerband and this at times is a killjoy at the racetrack. Does a -1/+1 make sense or a +2 is the bare minimum to get any noticeable difference? What would be the impact on the top end with a +1 or a +2 at the rear?

2. Massively confused on whether to go for a 520 conversion or 525? Steel sprockets or Aluminium ones?

I am leaning towards Renthal for sprockets and DID for chain. My usage is a mix of weekend riding and trackdays.

Thank you
I just went down one tooth on the front as I found the stock gearing to be stupid tall... particularly for the road. Had to do the same on an RSV4 I just came off, but have never felt the urge to mess with the gearing on the older generation litre bikes.

I wouldn't say it completely transformed the bike, but it now has a little more pump in 1st and 2nd. I'm not sure what type of roads you are riding, but I do feel that I would want to avoid losing any more top end on my bike. Don't care what the theoretical top speeds are pre/post dropping one tooth on the front... I can just feel a bit more of a hole once speeds start getting around the low 200's... which is perfect for where/how I ride at the moment.

Didn't feel the need to go 520. I mean, its not like I'm chasing tens of seconds.
trackaddict likes this.
buswedg is offline  
post #17 of 45 Old 01-04-2017, 01:35 AM Thread Starter
Track Day Rider
 
vroomshankar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: India
Posts: 147
Posting Frequency
Images: 3
 
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by buswedg View Post
I just went down one tooth on the front as I found the stock gearing to be stupid tall... particularly for the road. Had to do the same on an RSV4 I just came off, but have never felt the urge to mess with the gearing on the older generation litre bikes.

I wouldn't say it completely transformed the bike, but it now has a little more pump in 1st and 2nd. I'm not sure what type of roads you are riding, but I do feel that I would want to avoid losing any more top end on my bike. Don't care what the theoretical top speeds are pre/post dropping one tooth on the front... I can just feel a bit more of a hole once speeds start getting around the low 200's... which is perfect for where/how I ride at the moment.

Didn't feel the need to go 520. I mean, its not like I'm chasing tens of seconds.
Thanks. My riding is 50% highway riding on weekends and 50% trackdays. I do not take the bike out in the town unless I am going to the service center.

For my street riding I dont want to lose too much top end. I need the top end to still be upwards of 185 mph. For my track days I need better drive out of corners which the stock gearing is horrible at. By the time I come into the powerband currently I have already lost precious seconds in the lap.

I am not considering a -1/+2 as it will be an overkill for my needs.

Presently evaluating the +2R (thanks Skydork for the feedback) vs the -1F vs the -1/+1. Using gearingcommander for a comparitive analysis of the three combinations.
vroomshankar is offline  
post #18 of 45 Old 01-04-2017, 02:27 AM
Squid
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 17
Posting Frequency
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by buswedg View Post
I just went down one tooth on the front as I found the stock gearing to be stupid tall... particularly for the road. Had to do the same on an RSV4 I just came off, but have never felt the urge to mess with the gearing on the older generation litre bikes.

I wouldn't say it completely transformed the bike, but it now has a little more pump in 1st and 2nd. I'm not sure what type of roads you are riding, but I do feel that I would want to avoid losing any more top end on my bike. Don't care what the theoretical top speeds are pre/post dropping one tooth on the front... I can just feel a bit more of a hole once speeds start getting around the low 200's... which is perfect for where/how I ride at the moment.

Didn't feel the need to go 520. I mean, its not like I'm chasing tens of seconds.
oops, should mention that I meant 200-kmph. But you probably could have guessed that.
buswedg is offline  
post #19 of 45 Old 01-04-2017, 07:46 AM Thread Starter
Track Day Rider
 
vroomshankar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: India
Posts: 147
Posting Frequency
Images: 3
 
Garage
Thanks everyone for the inputs and suggestions.

Skydork, thanks for your feedback. Have decided to go for the +2R for now. Incase I still feel the need for it will add a -1 later for the trackday use. For now going for the Vortex Steel sprockets (17/41) and EK 3D chain (120 links option) all in 525 pitch.

As per gearingcommander, a +2R vs stock setup will still keep the top end at 299.8 kmph which is basically no love lost for me since my bike is still restricted to the 299 top speed. Like someone suggested on another thread, a 2+ on the rear means a bump up in the rpm by about 500 rpms which shouldnt be too much of a hit on the gas mileage either. Seems like a win-win. :)

Last edited by vroomshankar; 01-04-2017 at 11:32 AM.
vroomshankar is offline  
post #20 of 45 Old 01-04-2017, 04:42 PM
Track Day Rider
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 105
Posting Frequency
 
I use gearingcommander to compare previous bikes I've had versus what I have now. My first sportbike was a 2008 cbr1000rr which was +3. I compared it to my gen4 and determined +2 was about the same and loved that gearing. Gen5 gears 2-6 have been changed and are more aggressive than Gen4 gearing. For example Gen5 stock gearing 3rd gear is equal to Gen4 3rd gear -1+2. I like the stock gearing but will try +1 just because I have it hanging on the wall. My advise is to use gearingcommander to compare what you had before versus what you have now.
cwrzx is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Kawasaki ZX-10R.net forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome